Tender detail

Cost-benefit model for optimising spatial decision-making processes

Summary

The tender concerns the development of a cost-benefit model for optimising spatial decision-making processes. The bidder must prepare a model that helps assess the justification and financial impact of the planned interventions for three innovation projects on administrative costs, the target group’s time use and socio-economic impact. The bid must include a project plan, expert team information and other confirmations required by the tender documents.

Reference number
313261-0000
Buyer
Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium
Country
Estonia (EST)
Procedure
Simplified procurement
CPV
71241000 Feasibility study, advisory service, analysis
Deadline
2026-08-27
Status
Open
Contract subject
Services
Estimated value
50 000,00 EUR
Source
RHR

Participation requirements

Tender requirements are available in the official tender documents.

Compliance requirements

The tender notice includes mandatory exclusion grounds for convictions related to participation in a criminal organisation, corruption, fraud and the other standard grounds listed in the ESPD. If an exclusion ground applies, the bidder may be allowed to provide evidence of self-cleaning where the procurement documents so permit or where the law allows it. The exact exclusion grounds and any recovery/self-cleaning details must be checked in the official tender documents.

Qualification criteria and exclusion grounds

The bidder must submit the confirmations, evidence and forms required in the ESPD and the compliance conditions. The bid must include a project plan, the composition of the expert team and CV-form information on the experts’ previous experience. If the bid is signed by a person who is not a legally authorised representative in the commercial register, a power of attorney must be attached. In a joint bid, a power of attorney for the joint bidders must be attached. The bid must comply with all tender document requirements and conditional bids are not allowed. If equivalence is relied on, it must be explained and supporting evidence must be attached. The machine-readable notice did not include precise turnover, experience or team requirements; these must be checked in the tender documents.